Categories: General

Did She Consent?

Did She Consent? is a guest post submitted by Yemisi Onaopemipo (Lawyer).

The Internet in Nigeria has literally been set afire over the last few days.

Some commentators have claimed that since there was no violence involved it was not a rape.

Well, the law is quite explicit on what constitutes a Rape and that includes the following:

“Rape is penetration of the vagina, anus or mouth of another person with a penis without their consent.” SEE Violence Against Persons Prohibition Act (VAPPA) 2015, OGUNBAYO V. STATE (2007) LPELR-2323(SC), IDI V. STATE (2017) LPELR-42587 (SC) and STATE V. MUSA (2018) LPELR-46318 (CA).

The “absence of consent” is what determines whether sexual activity was a rape or not. The victim may have been intimidated by the assailant by means of a weapon, or threats to harm her or someone close to her or by virtue of the position he wields over her. Out of fright, she may have frozen and been unable to speak or scream out in fright or might have gone limp. It still does not mean consent.

The victim may not physically fight back. This still does not mean consent.

The victim may have been scared, intimidated, bullied, restrained, asleep, incapacitated, inebriated or underaged. It still does not mean consent.

The Rape may have been violent or non-violent. This still does not mean consent.

The victim may not have mentioned it to anyone else. It still does not mean consent.

The activity may have commenced with consent but once consent is withdrawn, it becomes rape.

There is also statutory rape, which is a sexual activity with a minor, that is, anyone younger than 18 years of age.

lawpavilion

View Comments

Recent Posts

Options Open To A Party Or Counsel Where There Is Genuine Cause For Complaint Against A Judge Or Magistrate In Judicial Proceedings

By Sylvester Udemezue Where a lawyer (or litigant) has good grounds for complaints against a…

21 hours ago

Unveiling the Key to Debt Recovery Success: Is a Statement of Account the Ultimate Weapon?

CASE TITLE: IYANAM v. UBA PLC & ANOR (2024) LPELR-61550 (CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 5TH JANUARY,…

4 days ago

Navigating the Nuances: Circumstances When the Defense of ‘Volenti Non Fit Injuria’ Will Be Inapplicable in a Banker-Customer Transaction

CASE TITLE: FIDELITY BANK PLC v. PETER (2024) LPELR-61551(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 5TH JANUARY, 2024 JUSTICES:…

4 days ago

Amendment Of Section 24 Of The Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, Etc.) Act 2015: A Fruit Of Strategic Litigation

By Olumide Babalola IntroductionStrategic litigation has been defined as “using legal means aiming to ‘bring…

4 days ago

Repositioning Legal Services for Optimal Impact in the Public Sector (2)

Last week, I shared the introductory part of my keynote address delivered at the 2023…

4 days ago