INTRODUCTION
This appeal borders on the Enforcement of Fundamental Rights.
CASE TITLE: MINISTER OF DEFENCE v. YAGANAMI & ANOR (2022) LPELR-57700(CA)
JUDGMENT DATE: 2ND JUNE, 2022
PRACTICE AREA: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
LEAD JUDGMENT: EBIOWEI TOBI, J.C.A.
SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT:
FACTS
This is an appeal against the ruling and judgment of the Federal High Court of Nigeria, Maiduguri Judicial Division, delivered by Hon. Justice M. T. Salihu on 10/07/2014.
The 1st Respondent, Applicant in the lower Court alleged he was unlawfully arrested and kept in the custody of the Appellant without bail hence the suit for the enforcement of his fundamental right was instituted. The 1st Respondent filed the originating motion seeking for a declaration (among other reliefs sought) that his continued arrest and detention without just cause was illegal and unconstitutional and consequently sought an order of his production before the trial Court.
The Appellant here filed a notice of preliminary objection to the action challenging the jurisdiction of the Court to entertain the matter specifically on the provision of Section 2(a) of the Public Officers Protection Act (POPA). The Court in a considered ruling dismissed the preliminary objection. The Appellant in this appeal lost the preliminary objection and the substantive suit.
The Appellant dissatisfied and unhappy with both the ruling and judgment of the lower Court filed this appeal to the Court of Appeal.
ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION
The appeal was determined on the following issues:
1. Whether the Respondent’s action is competent thus vesting the trial Court with jurisdiction to entertain same having regard to the materials placed before the Court.
2. Whether the Responded has discharged the burden of proof placed upon him as required by the law to entitle him to the reliefs sought
3. Whether the trial Court has not misconceived the position of law relating to the burden of proof under the Nigerian law.
ALSO READ: Proper Court to File Pre-Election Matter; Effect of Failure to File Same within Time
DECISION/HELD
The appeal was allowed. The judgment of the Federal High Court was aside.
RATIOS:
Introduction The legal profession has always been known for its high standards and unique demands,…
CASE TITLE: UNITY BANK PLC v. ALONGE (2024) LPELR-61898(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 4TH APRIL, 2024 JUSTICES:…
CASE TITLE: ODIONYE v. FRN (2024) LPELR-62923(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 5TH SEPTEMBER, 2024 PRACTICE AREA: CRIMINAL LAW…
CASE TITLE: EFFIONG v. MOBIL PRODUCING (NIG.) UNLTD (2024) LPELR-62930(CA)JUDGMENT DATE: 27TH SEPTEMBER, 2024PRACTICE AREA:…
CASE TITLE: ONWUSOR v. STATE (2024) LPELR-63031(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 12TH NOVEMBER, 2024 PRACTICE AREA: CRIMINAL…
By Femi Falana SAN Introduction Last week, President Bola Tinubu ordered the immediate termination of…