Categories: Be the FIRST to KNOW

Whether the Court can Interfere with the Internal Affairs of Political Parties

CASE TITLE: ISHAKU v. SULEIMAN & ORS (2023) LPELR-59910(CA)

JUDGMENT DATE: 23RD FEBRUARY, 2023

PRACTICE AREA: ELECTORAL MATTERS

LEAD JUDGMENT: ISAIAH OLUFEMI AKEJU, J.C.A.

SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT:

INTRODUCTION:

This appeal borders on electoral matters.

FACTS:

This appeal is against the judgment of the High Court of Adamawa State holden in Yola, delivered on 10th January, 2023 in Suit No. HC/ADSY/202/ 2022 which action the 1st and 2nd Respondents commenced by the Originating Summons filed at the State High Court in Yola. Issues were joined by the parties and the High Court of Adamawa State (the trial Court) gave judgment in favour of the 1st and 2nd Respondents and granted their reliefs.

The Appellant who was a defendant in the action was dissatisfied with the judgment of the trial Court hence this appeal.

ISSUES:

The Court determined the appeal on the following issues:

​1. Whether the 1st and 2nd Respondents’ Suit at the trial Court which borders on discipline and membership of a Political Party is justiciable for determination by any Court of law?

2. Whether the trial Court being a High Court of State possesses the requisite jurisdiction under Section 272 of the Constitution to entertain the 1st and 2nd Respondents’ Originating Summons at the trial Court which agitates pre-election and/or election-related dispute seeking disqualification of a Candidate?

3. Assuming without conceding that the trial Court possess the requisite Jurisdiction, whether the 1st and 2nd Respondents possess the requisite Locus Standi to institute the action at the Trial Court?

DECISION/HELD:

In the final analysis, the Court allowed the appeal.

RATIOS:

  • APPEAL – NOTICE(S) OF APPEAL: Whether a notice of appeal can be served by electronic mail
  • ELECTORAL MATTERS – JURISDICTION: Whether the court has jurisdiction to interfere with matters which concern the running of the internal affairs of political parties
  • ELECTORAL MATTERS – PRE-ELECTION MATTERS: Whether the High Court of a State has jurisdiction to hear and determine pre-election matters
  • PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – SERVICE OF COURT PROCESS(ES): Importance of service of Court process(es)

lawpavilion

Recent Posts

Attorney General’s Consent: A Legal Requirement for Garnishee Proceedings Against the Government?

Introduction The latest decision by the Tax Appeal Tribunal (TAT) on Value Added Tax (VAT)…

3 days ago

5 Ways CaseManager Can Enhance Your Team Performance and Tasks

What is LawPavilion CaseManager Software?Key Features of CaseManager Software:5 Ways CaseManager Can Help Your TeamConclusion…

4 days ago

Whether an Aggrieved Party Must Exhaust All the Remedies Available to Him in Law Before Resorting to Court

CASE TITLE: FADAIRO & ORS v. NASU & ANOR (2024) LPELR-62868(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 12TH JULY,…

4 days ago

Position of the Law Regarding the Requirement of Consent of the Attorney General Before Garnishee Proceedings Can Lie Against Any Government

CASE TITLE: CBN v. OCHIFE & ORS (2025) LPELR-80220(SC) JUDGMENT DATE: 24TH JANUARY, 2025 PRACTICE…

4 days ago

Application of the Doctrine of Stare Decisis

CASE TITLE:  SUIMING ELECTRICAL LTD v. FRN & ORS (2025) LPELR-80179(SC) JUDGMENT DATE: 29TH JANUARY,…

4 days ago

Whether a Bank is Bound to obey the Mandate of a Customer

CASE TITLE: ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES v. POLARIS BANK LTD & ANOR (2025) LPELR-80188(SC) JUDGMENT DATE: 17TH…

4 days ago