CASE TITLE: ADEKUNLE & ORS v. AHMAD (2025) LPELR-81978(CA)
JUDGMENT DATE: 3RD SEPTEMBER, 2025
PRACTICE AREA: ISLAMIC LAW AND PROCEDURE
LEAD JUDGMENT: MUHAMMED LAWAL SHUAIBU, J.C.A.
SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT:
INTRODUCTION:
This appeal borders on Islamic Personal Law.
FACTS:
This is an appeal against the decision of the Sharia Court of Appeal, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, delivered on the 4th day of May, 2023, upholding the ruling of the trial Area Court, Gudu, assuming jurisdiction to entertain the subject matter of the Respondent’s claim, that is, the distribution of the estate of late Alhaji Jimoh Adekunle.
The Respondent instituted a civil suit before the trial Area Court against the Appellants for the distribution of the estate of late Jimoh Adekitan Adekunle. The Respondent was married to the deceased in accordance with Islamic Law while there was already a subsisting marriage between the deceased and the 1st Appellant under the Marriage Act, which marriage gave birth to the 2nd and 3rd Appellants.
Upon being served with the originating processes, the Appellants filed a notice of preliminary objection, challenging the jurisdiction of the trial Court. The trial Court overruled the preliminary objection and assumed jurisdiction to distribute the estate of the deceased who died as a Muslim.
Aggrieved with the decision of the trial Court, Appellants lodged an appeal at the Sharia Court of Appeal which affirmed the earlier decision of the trial Court. It is against the decision of the Sharia Court of Appeal that the Appellants have approached the Court of Appeal through a notice of appeal filed on 20th July, 2023.
ISSUE(S) FOR DETERMINATION:
The Court determined the appeal on a sole issue for determination, thus:
Whether the lower Court was right to have upheld the decision of the trial Court in its judgment conferring on the trial Court to entertain the matter of inheritance and distribution of properties where there is a subsisting and valid marriage under the Act
DECISION/HELD:
The Court held that the appeal lacked merit and it was dismissed with costs, which the Court assessed at ₦100,000 in favour of the Respondent against the Appellants.
RATIOS:
To read the full judgment or similar judgments, subscribe to Prime or Primsol
INTRODUCTION The tax investigation involving Lafarge Africa Plc (Lafarge) and the Ogun State Internal Revenue…
By way of introduction, the term allocutus is derived from the classical Latin word allocutio…
By Hyginus Ibega Esq. The Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) has recently introduced new measures for…
By Femi Falana SAN Following the cessation of the emergency rule in Rivers State on…
CASE TITLE: PHILIP v. ADSU, MUBI & ORS (2025) LPELR-81492(CA)JUDGMENT DATE: 26TH JUNE, 2025JUSTICES: FREDERICK…
CASE TITLE: ACCESS BANK PLC v. EDIALE (2025) LPELR-81868(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 22ND JULY, 2025 PRACTICE…