WHETHER AN APPLICANT NEEDS TO ESTABLISH TITLE OF THE LAND HE OCCUPIES, BEFORE HE CAN BRING AN ACTION TO ENFORCE HIS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AGAINST WHOEVER VIOLATES HIS RIGHT OF OCCUPATION OF THE LAND/PROPERTY.

CASE TITLE: GOVERNMENT OF ENUGU STATE OF NIGERIA & ORS v. SUNDAY ONYA & ORS (2021) LPELR-52688(CA)                                                                                                                   

JUDGMENT DATE:         28th JANUARY, 2021

JUSTICES:                         AHMAD OLAREWAJU BELGORE JCA

                                           ITA GEORGE MBABA JCA

                                           JOSEPH OLUBUNMI KAYODE OYEWOLE JCA

COURT DIVISION:         ENUGU

PRACTICE AREA:          Constitutional Law – Enforcement of Fundamental Human Rights.

FACTS:

​The Respondents, were allocated spaces to build stalls at what later became ENSEPA Mini Shops by the Enugu State Environmental Protection Agency (ENSEPA), an Agency of the Government of Enugu State. The Respondents paid the necessary approved fees, as demanded by the Appellants for the stalls/shop and were put in possession of their respective allocated spaces, following which they developed the stalls according to the prototype and specifications from ENSEPA.

The Appellants later issued notices to the Respondents to vacate their stalls in the park claiming compulsory acquisition of the stalls by the government. Subsequently, they demolished the stalls built by Respondents and which the Respondents occupied. The Respondents sought the services of Estate Surveyors and Valuers to value their demolished property and the firm valued the property at N850,000.00 each and issued certificates to each of the Respondents.

The Respondents as Applicants, then filed a representative action at Enugu State High Court seeking to enforce their fundamental human rights and for compensation from the Appellants for the compulsory acquisition and demolition of their stalls. The High Court found the Appellants liable for breach of the Respondents Fundamental Rights and granted their reliefs, including the award of N850,000.00 to each of them and also exemplary damages and cost against the Appellants.

Dissatisfied, with the decision of the trial High Court, the Appellants appealed.

ISSUES:

The appeal was determined upon consideration of the following issues:

(1) Whether the suit was properly instituted by the Applicants (Respondents), jointly.

(2) Whether the trial Court was right to hold the Appellants liable for breach of fundamental rights of Respondents, in the circumstances of the case.

WHAT OUR CLIENTS ARE SAYING…

I enjoy the software. Law Pavilion, Thumbs up!”

~BARR. NWAFILI OKWUOSA

lawpavilion

Recent Posts

The Exclusive Original Jurisdiction of Military Justice System over Serving Military Personnel – By Col. BU Okorie (Rtd) Esq.

Introduction Introduction 1. Section 123 of the Armed Forces Act (AFA) provides that every allegation…

2 days ago

Nigerian Police and FHR: Between Investigation and Incrimination, Prosecution and Persecution

By M.B. Abdulazeez, Esq. “Prosecution, in principle, should uphold justice, but too often in Nigeria,…

2 days ago

Constitution, Legislature’s Rules and Standing Order

By Rotimi OgunleyeVarious personalities operating within the confines of Nigeria’s legislative houses have, of late,…

2 days ago

Legal-Specific Collaboration Tools: 4 Untold Benefits for Law Firms

If you're still toggling between WhatsApp messages, emails, and scattered documents for your legal research,…

2 days ago

3 Things Smart Lawyers Do Differently with Legal Research

Have you ever wondered why some lawyers seem to often win in court, even when…

2 days ago

Restoring Credible Justice: Bridging The Gap Between Law And Public Trust In Nigeria’s Judiciary – By Chief Emeka Ozoani, SAN

Being a Paper Delivered At The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Benin Branch Law Week, On…

4 days ago