WHETHER AN APPLICANT NEEDS TO ESTABLISH TITLE OF THE LAND HE OCCUPIES, BEFORE HE CAN BRING AN ACTION TO ENFORCE HIS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AGAINST WHOEVER VIOLATES HIS RIGHT OF OCCUPATION OF THE LAND/PROPERTY.

CASE TITLE: GOVERNMENT OF ENUGU STATE OF NIGERIA & ORS v. SUNDAY ONYA & ORS (2021) LPELR-52688(CA)                                                                                                                   

JUDGMENT DATE:         28th JANUARY, 2021

JUSTICES:                         AHMAD OLAREWAJU BELGORE JCA

                                           ITA GEORGE MBABA JCA

                                           JOSEPH OLUBUNMI KAYODE OYEWOLE JCA

COURT DIVISION:         ENUGU

PRACTICE AREA:          Constitutional Law – Enforcement of Fundamental Human Rights.

FACTS:

​The Respondents, were allocated spaces to build stalls at what later became ENSEPA Mini Shops by the Enugu State Environmental Protection Agency (ENSEPA), an Agency of the Government of Enugu State. The Respondents paid the necessary approved fees, as demanded by the Appellants for the stalls/shop and were put in possession of their respective allocated spaces, following which they developed the stalls according to the prototype and specifications from ENSEPA.

The Appellants later issued notices to the Respondents to vacate their stalls in the park claiming compulsory acquisition of the stalls by the government. Subsequently, they demolished the stalls built by Respondents and which the Respondents occupied. The Respondents sought the services of Estate Surveyors and Valuers to value their demolished property and the firm valued the property at N850,000.00 each and issued certificates to each of the Respondents.

The Respondents as Applicants, then filed a representative action at Enugu State High Court seeking to enforce their fundamental human rights and for compensation from the Appellants for the compulsory acquisition and demolition of their stalls. The High Court found the Appellants liable for breach of the Respondents Fundamental Rights and granted their reliefs, including the award of N850,000.00 to each of them and also exemplary damages and cost against the Appellants.

Dissatisfied, with the decision of the trial High Court, the Appellants appealed.

ISSUES:

The appeal was determined upon consideration of the following issues:

(1) Whether the suit was properly instituted by the Applicants (Respondents), jointly.

(2) Whether the trial Court was right to hold the Appellants liable for breach of fundamental rights of Respondents, in the circumstances of the case.

WHAT OUR CLIENTS ARE SAYING…

I enjoy the software. Law Pavilion, Thumbs up!”

~BARR. NWAFILI OKWUOSA

lawpavilion

Recent Posts

The Absence of a Specific Relief for Declaration of Title is not Fatal to a Claim for Trespass to Land.

By O. Ogbom, Esq In the realm of property law, disputes over land ownership and…

5 days ago

Certification of Public Document: When Payment of Legal Fees won’t be Mandatory

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Abuja Before Their LordshipsAdamu JauroJummai Hannatu Sankey…

5 days ago

A Synopsis of The Laws Governing International Arbitration

An arbitration is international where the parties to an arbitration, at the time of concluding…

5 days ago

Virtualization and Digitalization of Proceedings in Nigerian Superior Courts: How Prepared Are Our Courts?

By Francis Moses Nworah, Esq. INTRODUCTION: Today’s information technology age has ‘merged’ the otherwise distinct…

5 days ago

The Court of Appeal Rules, 2021: Procedural Impact on Appeals Emanating from Courts-Martial to the Court of Appeal

Background: Despite being an apex disciplinary organ of the Armed Forces, the decision of a…

1 week ago

Alleged Misuse of Personal Data in Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan Attempted Recall Sparks Privacy Concerns for Social Assistance Beneficiaries in Africa – Tolulope Idowu

The recent controversy surrounding the attempted recall of Nigerian Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has done more…

1 week ago