Categories: Be the FIRST to KNOW

Whether Administrative Bail Is Provided For in the Constitution

CASE TITLE: EFCC v. UBOH (2022) LPELR-57968(CA)

JUDGMENT DATE: 30TH JUNE, 2022

PRACTICE AREA: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

LEAD JUDGMENT: BALKISU BELLO ALIYU, J.C.A.

SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT:

INTRODUCTION

This appeal borders in enforcement of fundamental human rights.

FACTS

This appeal is against the decision of the Federal High Court, sitting at Uyo, Akwa Ibom State delivered on the 10th April, 2018 in respect of an application by way of a notice of motion no: FHC/UY/46/2018 filed by the Respondent for the enforcement of his fundamental rights against the Appellant. The facts of the case are that the Appellant received a written petition from one Bridget Bassey against the Respondent upon which it invited the Respondent for investigation. Upon honouring the invitation of the Appellant the Respondent was arrested and detained on the 15th February, 2018, and he claimed that he was refused bail by the Appellant neither was he charged to Court for any offence within the period stipulated by the Constitution.

The Appellant denied infringing the Respondent’s fundamental rights and asserted that the Respondent was indeed granted bail on liberal terms but he was unable to fulfill the conditions of the bail, and he did not approach the Appellant to vary the conditions for him before filing the application.

That Subsequently, the Appellant filed a charge of obtaining money by false pretence contrary to Section 1(1)(a) of the Advance Fee Fraud and other Related Offences Act at the Akwa Ibom State High Court, Uyo division, but was not given a date for arraignment of the Respondent before the filing of his application.

The trial Court found in favor of the Respondent. Dissatisfied, the Appellant appealed.

ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION

The appeal was determined upon consideration of the issues thus:

1. Whether in view of the facts and circumstances of this appeal, the lower Court was right in holding that the fundamental rights of the Respondent was violated by the Appellant.

2. Whether Respondent is entitled to damages for violation of his fundamental rights as decided by the Court below.

DECISION/HELD

The appeal failed and was dismissed.

RATIOS:

  • CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – BREACH OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS: Whether a person unlawfully arrested/detained is entitled to compensation
  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE – BAIL: Whether administrative bail is provided for in the Constitution; duty of the arresting authority who intends to detain a suspect beyond the prescribed period
  • GOVERNMENT AGENCY – ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CRIMES COMMISSION: Whether the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission has powers to freeze the Account of a Customer without an order of Court

lawpavilion

Recent Posts

The Implication of Section 41(8) of the Nigeria Tax Administration Act (NTAA) 2025

Section 41(8) of NTAA stipulates that where a taxpayer is dissatisfied with the judgment of…

7 hours ago

Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) in Nigeria: Legal, Ethical and Policy Perspectives

By Success Oghosa Osaretin Introduction Infertility affects a significant portion of Nigeria’s population, with estimates…

7 hours ago

Pretrial Issues Under The Administration of Criminal Justice Law 2015 – Reform & Recommendations (Part 1)

BY LYDIA EHISUORIA OHONSI The Lagos State Administration of Criminal Justice Law (ACJL) 2015 addresses…

1 week ago

Health Care Fraud and Abuse: A Growing Concern

INTRODUCTION Health care fraud and abuse are growing concerns globally, particularly in Nigeria, where millions…

1 week ago

Whether a Sitting Governor and a Commissioner of Police Can be Sued for Violation of Fundamental Rights in Nigeria

By Abubakar Muhammad The Constitutional Framework of Fundamental Rights The 1999 Constitution of the Federal…

1 week ago

Third Party Investigations and Six-Year Limit for Tax Assessments

INTRODUCTION The tax investigation involving Lafarge Africa Plc (Lafarge) and the Ogun State Internal Revenue…

2 weeks ago