CASE TITLE: FRN v. SHIKAAN (2025) LPELR-81388(CA)
JUDGMENT DATE: 8TH MAY, 2025
PRACTICE AREA: CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE
LEAD JUDGMENT: NEHIZENA IDEMUDIA AFOLABI, J.C.A.
SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT:
INTRODUCTION:
This appeal borders on the offences of obtaining money by false pretence and criminal breach of trust.
FACTS:
This appeal is against the judgment of the High Court of Justice, Makurdi, Benue State, delivered on 2 February 2024 by Hon. Justice A.I. Ityonyiman, which discharged and acquitted the respondent of a two-count charge of obtaining money by false pretence and criminal breach of trust.
The nominal complainant, Mr. Sunday Onaji, a businessman dealing in agricultural produce, was introduced to the respondent, who represented himself as a seller of paddy rice. The respondent took him to a supposed warehouse along University of Agriculture Road, Makurdi, for inspection. Relying on this representation, the complainant agreed to purchase ten metric tons of paddy rice at ₦110,000 per ton, totalling ₦1.1 million. Payment was made into the respondent’s First Bank account on 24 January 2018. However, immediately after the payment, the respondent absconded and could not be reached, while the rice allegedly shown to the complainant was later discovered to be nonexistent.
Investigations by the EFCC confirmed that the respondent had fraudulently obtained the ₦1.1 million under the pretence of supplying rice, and further revealed that he absconded after receiving the money. He was eventually arrested on 19 December 2018 and, upon interrogation, admitted receiving the money and failing to deliver the goods. He was arraigned on 2 March 2021, and both prosecution and defence presented evidence at trial.
In its judgment, the trial court held that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt and accordingly discharged and acquitted the respondent on both counts. Dissatisfied, the appellant lodged this appeal.
ISSUE(S) FOR DETERMINATION:
The Court formulated a sole issue for determination, viz:
“Whether the prosecution has proved all the ingredients of the offences charged against the Appellant beyond a reasonable doubt as required by law.”
DECISION/HELD:
The appeal was found to be lacking in merit. Consequently, the judgment of the trial Court was affirmed.
RATIOS:
To read the full judgment or similar judgments, subscribe to Prime or Primsol
INTRODUCTION The tax investigation involving Lafarge Africa Plc (Lafarge) and the Ogun State Internal Revenue…
CASE TITLE: PHILIP v. ADSU, MUBI & ORS (2025) LPELR-81492(CA)JUDGMENT DATE: 26TH JUNE, 2025JUSTICES: FREDERICK…
CASE TITLE: ACCESS BANK PLC v. EDIALE (2025) LPELR-81868(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 22ND JULY, 2025 PRACTICE…
CASE TITLE: ADEKUNLE & ORS v. AHMAD (2025) LPELR-81978(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 3RD SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRACTICE…
The Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC) On March 20, 2025 issued the Nigeria Data Protection…
CASE TITLE: OIL & INDUSTRIAL SERVICES LTD v. HEMPEL PAINTS (SOUTH AFRICA) PTY LTD (2025)…