When Will an Order of Retrial Be Made?

CASE TITLE: OPADIJO & ANOR v. ALUKOSO & ORS (2025) LPELR-80814(CA)

JUDGMENT DATE: 2ND APRIL 2025

PRACTICE AREA: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

LEAD JUDGMENT: UWABUNKEONYE ONWOSI, J.C.A.

SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT:

INTRODUCTION:

This appeal borders on Civil Procedure.

FACTS:

This is an appeal against the judgment of High Court of Justice, Oyo State, Ibadan Judicial Division.

The Appellants (Claimant at the trial Court), by a Writ of Summons claimed the following reliefs at the trial Court as follows:

(a) The DECLARATION that the claimants are the beneficial owners and entitled to grant of right of occupancy in respect of all that parcel of land measuring approximately fifty (50) acres, situated, lying, and being at Arinkinsin Village, Alaaka Area, Ido Local Government Area, Ibadan, Oyo State of Nigeria.

(b) DECLARATION that the Defendants acts of entering upon portions measuring three (3) acres out of the said claimants family land without authority, consent, knowledge, or approval of the claimants constitute trespass.

(c) AN ORDER setting aside any purported sale or transaction in respect of any portion of the said three (3) acres of land between the Defendants and any other source different from the claimants family for being nullity.

(d) PERPETUAL INJUNCTION restraining the defendant, their agents, servants, privies, or however they are called from entering upon the said land.

At the conclusion of the trial, Counsel filed their respective final written addresses, and judgment was delivered in favour of the Respondents.

Dissatisfied, the Appellant appealed.

ISSUE(S) FOR DETERMINATION:

The Court adopted the issues formulated by the Appellant, viz:

Whether or not the trial Court properly considered and evaluated the Appellants case before arriving at its decision, the evidence of a witness (CW5) was totally omitted, having not formed part of the evidence considered by the trial Court.

DECISION/HELD:

In conclusion, the Court set aside the judgment of the lower Court. The suit was remitted back to the Chief Judge Oyo State to be reheard by another Judge.

RATIOS:

  • JUDGMENT AND ORDER – ORDER OF RETRIAL/TRIAL DE NOVO – Instances where an order of retrial will be made
  • COURT – APPELLATE COURT – Duty of an appellate court when hearing appeals
  • EVIDENCE – DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – Whether documentary evidence must be specifically pleaded to be admissible in evidence

To read the full judgment or similar judgments, subscribe to Prime or Primsol

lawpavilion

Recent Posts

Colonial Legacy and Justice: Section 84 Sheriff & Civil Process Act In CBN v. Inalegwu (2025) LPELR 80220 (SC)

By Nonso Obiadazie Esq. Introduction Enforcement of court judgment is an important part of our…

2 hours ago

Securing Maintenance in Divorce Proceedings before Final Judgment

By Babayemi Olaniyan Esq Introduction Maintenance is a form of financial support awarded to a…

18 hours ago

Not All Lawyer–Client Communications are Protected

CASE TITLE: FADAC ENTREPRISES LTD & ANOR V. CHIZEA & ANORLPELR-60624(SC)JUDGMENT DATE: 31ST MARCH, 2023JUSTICES:…

21 hours ago

Why the Surrogacy Bills are Illegal and Unconstitutional

By Sonnie Ekwowusi You may be well aware that two surrogacy bills are currently pending…

23 hours ago

Whether a Person Can Be Convicted of the Offence of Conspiracy Where His Co-Accused Have Been Discharged of the Same

CASE TITLE: SANI v. STATE (2025) LPELR-81692(CA) JUDGMENT DATE:  18TH JULY, 2025 PRACTICE AREA: CRIMINAL LAW…

1 day ago

What Qualifies an Action as Such Which Is Enforceable in an Application Brought Under the Fundamental Rights Enforcement Rules?

CASE TITLE:  BAKO v. YARO & ANOR (2025) LPELR-81706(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 24TH JULY, 2025 PRACTICE…

1 day ago