Categories: Be the FIRST to KNOW

WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF AN ACTION BROUGHT OUTSIDE A STATUTORILY LIMITED PERIOD?

If you find this case helpful and would like to access more cases like this, please subscribe to LawPavilion PRIME here

CASE TITLE: MONGUNO v. APC & ORS (2019) LPELR-47740(CA)

JUDGMENT DATE: 7TH JUNE, 2019

PRACTICE AREA: ELECTORAL MATTERS

LEAD JUDGMENT: UCHECHUKWU ONYEMENAM, J.C.A.

SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT:

INTRODUCTION

This appeal borders on Electoral Matters.

FACTS

This is an appeal against the decision of the Federal High Court presided by Jude K. Dakat J., delivered on the 2nd April 2019 in Suit No. FHC/MG/CS/60/2018, wherein the trial Court entered judgment in favour of the Respondents and against the Appellant by upholding the 1st and 2nd Respondents notice of preliminary objection which challenged the competence of Appellant’s Originating Summons on the main that Appellant’s action was statute barred.

​At the trial Court, the Appellant’s Originating Summons was filed on 30th October 2018. The Originating Summons is at page 1 of the records. The Appellant’s case is that the Originating Summons is a challenge of the decision of the Appeal Committee of the 1st Respondent in the return of the 2nd Respondent as the candidate of the 1st Respondent owing to several infractions. The 1st and 2nd Respondents filed a Notice of Preliminary Objection on 21st November 2018.

​The learned trial Judge after considering the objection of the 1st & 2nd Respondents held that the suit was statute barred thereby robbing the trial Court of its jurisdiction to determine the matter. The learned trial judge after upholding the objection dismissed the Appellant’s Claim, without making a pronouncement on the substantive suit.

Aggrieved with the decision of the High Court, the appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal.

ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION

The Court of Appeal determined the appeal on a sole issue which is:

“Whether the trial Court was right in his evaluation of the evidence before it to reach the conclusions that the Appellant failed to indicate the date the Appeal Committee report was made, and that the suit was statute barred.”

DECISION/HELD

On the whole, the Court found no merit in the appeal and accordingly dismissed same.

RATIOS:

  • ELECTORAL MATTERS – PRE-ELECTION MATTERS: Proper time to institute pre-election matters: how to determine the date of accrual of cause of action
  • ELECTORAL MATTERS – PARTY CONSTITUTION: Whether political parties must obey their own Constitutions
  • ELECTORAL MATTERS – PRE-ELECTION MATTERS: Proper Court to file pre-election matters
  • LIMITATION LAW – LIMITATION PERIOD: Effect of an action brought outside a statutorily limited period

lawpavilion

Recent Posts

Can There Be Two Independent Claims of Title and Damage for Trespass; Who Can Sue for Trespass?

CASE TITLE: OBHORRIBHO & ANOR V. ALEKE & ANOR (2025) LPELR- 82649(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 11TH…

3 days ago

What Does a Witness Have to do in Order to be Seen as Witness of Truth?

CASE TITLE: OPARA v. STATE (2025) LPELR- 82393(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 4TH AUGUST, 2025 PRACTICE AREA: CRIMINAL…

3 days ago

Whether Publication in Official Gazette Satisfies The Statutory Mode of Service of Notice of Revocation of Right of Occupancy

CASE TITLE: EDWARD & ANOR V. OKETOKUN & ORS (2025) LPELR-82633(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 4TH DECEMBER,…

3 days ago

Can a Judge Lawfully Shut The Courtroom Door?

CASE TITLE: ALABI V. BELLO LPELR-59030(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 17TH FEBURARY, 2022 JUSTICES: ALI ABUBAKAR BABANDI…

3 days ago

A Review of Significant Decisions in Labour and Employment Matters – 2025

Folabi Kuti SAN Armed with the post-2011 constitutional mandate and an express directive to apply…

1 week ago

Medical Misconduct: You Don’t Have to Be Named to Be Investigated

CASE TITLE: RALU V. MEDICAL & DENTAL PRACTITIONERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL LPELR-81420(CAJUDGMENT DATE: 9TH MAY, 2025JUSTICES:…

1 week ago