Categories: Be the FIRST to KNOW

Time Within Which to File a Criminal Appeal to the Supreme Court from the Decision of the Court Of Appeal; Effect of Failure

CASE TITLE: STEPHEN v. STATE (2022) LPELR-57336(SC)

JUDGMENT DATE: 25TH FEBRUARY, 2022

PRACTICE AREA: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

LEAD JUDGMENT: EMMANUEL AKOMAYE AGIM, J.S.C.

SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT:

INTRODUCTION

This appeal borders on Criminal Law and Procedure.

FACTS

The Appellant herein and one Kuroakegha Femowei, were charged before the Bayelsa State High Court, for the offences of Conspiracy and Armed Robbery.

At the close of trial, they were found guilty of lesser offences of Conspiracy to commit Robbery and Robbery and sentenced to twenty-one (21) years imprisonment.

The Appellant was dissatisfied with his conviction and sentence and appealed to the Court of Appeal. The crux of his appeal at the Court was that the trial Court was in error to have convicted him for a lesser offence, when there is no provision under the Robbery and Firearms (Special Provisions) Act, CAP R11, LFN 2004, to do so.

The Court of Appeal in its judgment affirmed the judgment of the trial court and dismissed the appeal. The Appellant, further aggrieved by the judgment of the Court of Appeal, appealed to the Supreme Court.

ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION

The Apex Court pointed out that the Notice of Appeal giving birth to this appeal was filed 53 days after the judgment of the Court of Appeal in clear contravention of the provisions of Section 27(2)(b) of the Supreme Court Act 2004, which provides that a notice of appeal should be filed within 30 days after the judgment of the Court of Appeal. Thus the appeal was decided on the propriety or otherwise of the time the appeal was filed.

DECISION/HELD

The appeal was unanimously struck out.

RATIOS:

  • APPEAL – NOTICE(S) OF APPEAL: Effect of a notice of appeal filed out of time
  • APPEAL – CRIMINAL APPEAL: Time within which to file a criminal appeal to the Supreme Court from the decision of the Court of Appeal; effect of failure

lawpavilion

Recent Posts

A Review of Significant Decisions in Labour and Employment Matters – 2025

Folabi Kuti SAN Armed with the post-2011 constitutional mandate and an express directive to apply…

2 days ago

Medical Misconduct: You Don’t Have to Be Named to Be Investigated

CASE TITLE: RALU V. MEDICAL & DENTAL PRACTITIONERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL LPELR-81420(CAJUDGMENT DATE: 9TH MAY, 2025JUSTICES:…

2 days ago

Whether Naming a Non-Juristic Person as a Party is a Misnomer; Can Amendment of Same Be Allowed?

CASE TITLE: ORHUE v. OSAGHAE (2025) LPELR-82606(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 3RD DECEMBER, 2025 PRACTICE AREA: PRACTICE…

2 days ago

How is Jurisdiction of Court Determined in Criminal Cases?

CASE TITLE:  OLALEKAN v. FRN (2025) LPELR-82652(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 15TH DECEMBER, 2025 PRACTICE AREA: CRIMINAL LAW…

2 days ago

Whether Differences Between a Person’s Signatures on Two Documents Mean That the Signatures Were Not Made by the Same Person

CASE TITLE: AMOBI v. NZEOWU & ORS (2025) LPELR-82651(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 15TH DECEMBER, 2025 PRACTICE…

2 days ago

Revisiting the Supreme Court Case of Sifax v. Migfo: Judicial Legislation in Plain Sight

By:  Kola’ Awodein SAN, FCTI, FICIArb & Misbau Alamu Lateef, Ph.D., SFHEA I. Introduction 1. The…

3 weeks ago