Categories: Client Relationship

The Nagamoto Retainer: The Virtual Law Firm

  • TEAMS NOT BRANCH OFFICES
  • HARNESSING COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE
  • THE POWER OF DELEGATION

THE BRIEF

“Dear Bar. Grace,

I write further to the instructions of our Founder and Chairman, Mr Hitoshi Nagamoto, and he sends his fond regards.

In light of the above we require your Firm to do the following:

1. Indicate if you are willing to accept our offer of Retainer as Legal Representative for Africa and if yes send us your Hourly Rates and draft Retainer agreement.

2. Draft an opinion on the regulatory requirements for starting a business in Nigeria and the implications of running that business through Nigeria into other African countries with emphasis on Enforcement of Contracts across Borders in Africa.

3. We had a partner in Nigeria called Star Enterprises who entered into an exclusive agreement with us, they breached our Contract and started using our Brand “Red Sun” to sell counterfeit phones, we would also like you to advise us on the Litigation process to commence against them, they are based in Edo State.

We expect that you will revert with all the above by tomorrow as Mr Nagamoto and I intend to meet with you on the last day of the IBA conference to discuss your advice in the aforementioned opinions.

Please note that we have sent this same instruction to 2 other Law Firms and will be speaking with the Firm that is able to give us the best advice within the stipulated time frame.

Sincerely,

Miko Hiyabosa
Head, Legal”

ACTIONS

HOW DO YOU MANAGE THE NEED FOR FAST TURNAROUND TIME VERSUS WELL RESEARCHED WORK?

Bar. Grace first sent an acknowledgement email to Miko and attached her Firm Profile, A draft Retainer Agreement and the Firms Hourly Rate that same night. She also created a Task on Case Manager and divided the Brief into Corporate for Hamza and Litigation for Chioma using the Case management Litigation and Non-Litigation folders under NAGAMOTO INDUSTRIES on the dashboard.

She left instruction’s for them to have both opinions ready in the next 6 hours as it was still 10:30 pm in Seoul whilst in Nigeria the time was 2:30 am and thus for the brief to be ready before 12 noon the next day in Seoul the Nigerian team should have concluded it by at most 9 am in Nigeria.

Do you think that is a mission impossible?

<<PREVIOUS   ——–    NEXT>>

lawpavilion

Share
Published by
lawpavilion

Recent Posts

Is Medical Evidence Enough to Prove Rape? An Analysis of the Legal Standard.

By Sani Abdullahi The use of medical evidence in rape cases has been a contentious…

2 days ago

FRSC cannot Criminalise the use of Faded Numbers Plates, Federal High Court Rules

The Federal High Court in Lagos has ruled that the Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC)…

2 days ago

The Nigeria Police Force (NPF) and Its Power to Effect Arrests Across State Boundaries.

By Saheed Hossein, Esq. The Nigeria Police Force (NPF) in any state of the federation…

2 days ago

Whether Compulsory Acquisition of Land Extinguishes the Existing Title to the Acquired Land

CASE TITLE: KOFARE & ANOR v. TAHIR & ANOR (2024) LPELR-63072(CA)JUDGMENT DATE: 28TH NOVEMBER, 2024PRACTICE…

2 days ago

Effect of an Incomplete Record on The Jurisdiction of The Court of Appeal

CASE TITLE: REGISTERED TRUSTEE OF MEDIA INITIATIVE AGAINST INJUSTICE VIOLENCE AND CORRUPTION (MIVOOC) v. A.G…

2 days ago

Ingredients Required to Establish the Offence of Culpable Homicide Punishable With Death and the Methods of Proving It

CASE TITLE: C.O.P. v. SIMON (2024) LPELR-63065(CA)JUDGMENT DATE: 2ND DECEMBER, 2024PRACTICE AREA: CRIMINAL LAW AND…

3 days ago