Position of the Law on Amendment of Charge

CASE TITLE: IBRAHIM v. FRN (2023) LPELR-61362(CA)
JUDGMENT DATE: 30TH NOVEMBER, 2023
PRACTICE AREA: CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE
LEAD JUDGMENT: UGOCHUKWU ANTHONY OGAKWU, J.C.A.

SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT:

INTRODUCTION:
This appeal borders on Criminal Law and Procedure.

FACTS:
This appeal emanated from the decision of the Federal High Court, Abuja Judicial Division, in CHARGE NO. FHC/ABJ/CR/43/2014: FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA v. SANI IBRAHIM. The charge was a one-count charge of dealing in cannabis sativa, a narcotic drug similar to cocaine, heroin, and LSD, without lawful authority. The Appellant pleaded guilty to the offence and after a review of the facts, the trial Court convicted the Appellant and sentenced him to a reformatory sentence of two months. Dissatisfied, the Appellant appealed.

ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION:

The Court determined the appeal on issues distilled by the Appellant, viz:

  1. Whether the Learned Trial Judge was right when His Lordship failed to order hearing notices to be issued and served on the Appellant’s counsel when such notices were required by law.
  1. Whether the learned trial judge was right in law when his Lordship convicted the Appellant on an amended or substituted charge without prior service of the said process (charge) upon the Defendant.

The Court also considered the merits of the cross-appeal.

DECISION/HELD:
In the final analysis, the Court dismissed the appeal.

RATIOS:
APPEAL – BRIEF OF ARGUMENT – Whether failure of the respondent to file brief of argument will make the appeal of the appellant to succeed
APPEAL – RECORD OF APPEAL – Whether parties and the Court are bound by the record of appeal; presumption of correctness of the contents of a record of appeal
• CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE – AMENDMENT OF CHARGE – Position of the law on amendment of charge
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – BREACH OF RIGHT TO FAIR HEARING – Instance where it cannot be said that a right to fair hearing has been breached

To read the full judgment or similar judgments, subscribe to Prime or Primsol

lawpavilion

Recent Posts

A Review of Significant Decisions in Labour and Employment Matters – 2025

Folabi Kuti SAN Armed with the post-2011 constitutional mandate and an express directive to apply…

13 hours ago

Medical Misconduct: You Don’t Have to Be Named to Be Investigated

CASE TITLE: RALU V. MEDICAL & DENTAL PRACTITIONERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL LPELR-81420(CAJUDGMENT DATE: 9TH MAY, 2025JUSTICES:…

14 hours ago

Whether Naming a Non-Juristic Person as a Party is a Misnomer; Can Amendment of Same Be Allowed?

CASE TITLE: ORHUE v. OSAGHAE (2025) LPELR-82606(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 3RD DECEMBER, 2025 PRACTICE AREA: PRACTICE…

14 hours ago

How is Jurisdiction of Court Determined in Criminal Cases?

CASE TITLE:  OLALEKAN v. FRN (2025) LPELR-82652(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 15TH DECEMBER, 2025 PRACTICE AREA: CRIMINAL LAW…

14 hours ago

Whether Differences Between a Person’s Signatures on Two Documents Mean That the Signatures Were Not Made by the Same Person

CASE TITLE: AMOBI v. NZEOWU & ORS (2025) LPELR-82651(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 15TH DECEMBER, 2025 PRACTICE…

14 hours ago

Revisiting the Supreme Court Case of Sifax v. Migfo: Judicial Legislation in Plain Sight

By:  Kola’ Awodein SAN, FCTI, FICIArb & Misbau Alamu Lateef, Ph.D., SFHEA I. Introduction 1. The…

3 weeks ago