Nature and Purpose of a Pre-Action Notice

CASE TITLE: IFEANYI OBIORA & ANOR v. OGUN STATE COMMANDANT NSCDC (2024) LPELR-62871(CA)
JUDGMENT DATE: 31ST JULY, 2024
PRACTICE AREA: CIVIL PROCEDURE
LEAD JUDGMENT: PATRICIA AJUMA MAHMOUD, J.C.A.

SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT:

INTRODUCTION:

This appeal borders on Civil Procedure.

FACTS:

This appeal is against the ruling of the Federal High Court sitting in Abeokuta, in a ruling delivered on the 9th of February, 2018, by Hon. Justice Ibrahim Watila.

The appellants were arrested with 32 jerry cans of 25 litres half-filled with petroleum products. They were prosecuted and these items tendered in evidence as exhibits. At the close of the prosecution’s case, the appellants made a ‘no case submission’ which resulted in their discharge by the trial Court. Pursuant to the discharge, the appellant waited for the statutory period of appeal to lapse and made a demand on the respondent for the return of the exhibits to them. After an unsuccessful demand, the appellant sued the respondent in Court.

Upon receipt of the appellant’s claim, the respondent filed a conditional appearance along with a notice of preliminary objection. The ground of the objection was that the suit was initiated without complying with the provision of Sections 20(3) and (4) of the Nigerian Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) Act, 2003, in respect of the pre-action notice. After settling the processes in respect of the preliminary objection and arguing the same, his Lordship upheld the preliminary objection, struck out the appellants’ suit for being a nullity and made an order for payment costs.

Dissatisfied with this ruling, the appellant appealed against it.

ISSUE(S) FOR DETERMINATION:

The Court adopted the issues formulated by the appellant in the determination of the appeal, thus:

1. WHETHER, from the totality of facts and laws placed before the Trial Lower Court and the circumstances of this case, there was Pre-Action notice to the Respondent in accordance with the law.

2. WHETHER the award of the sum of N30,000 (Thirty Thousand Naira) only by the Trial Court in favour of the Respondent against the Appellant was right and properly in tune with the Law in the circumstances.

DECISION/HELD:

In the final analysis, the appeal was allowed and the judgment of the trial Court was set aside.

RATIOS:

  • ACTION- PRE-ACTION NOTICE: Nature of a pre-action notice
  • ACTION- PRE-ACTION NOTICE: Purpose of a pre-action notice
  • ACTION- PRE-ACTION NOTICE: What should be the form of pre-notice?

To read the full judgment or similar judgments, subscribe to Prime or Primsol

lawpavilion

Recent Posts

Third Party Investigations and Six-Year Limit for Tax Assessments

INTRODUCTION The tax investigation involving Lafarge Africa Plc (Lafarge) and the Ogun State Internal Revenue…

4 weeks ago

Is Workplace Promotion a Privilege or a Right?

CASE TITLE: PHILIP v. ADSU, MUBI & ORS (2025) LPELR-81492(CA)JUDGMENT DATE: 26TH JUNE, 2025JUSTICES: FREDERICK…

4 weeks ago

Whether a Class of Persons Can Be Defamed; Duty on a Person Within That Class Who Intends to Maintain an Action for Defamation

CASE TITLE: ACCESS BANK PLC v. EDIALE (2025) LPELR-81868(CA) JUDGMENT DATE:  22ND JULY, 2025 PRACTICE…

4 weeks ago

Whether an Area Court Has Jurisdiction to Distribute the Estate of A Deceased Muslim who Contracted both a Statutory Marriage and an Islamic Marriage

CASE TITLE: ADEKUNLE & ORS v. AHMAD (2025) LPELR-81978(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 3RD SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRACTICE…

4 weeks ago

NDP Act 2023 GAID 2025: A Comprehensive Guide to Nigeria’s New Data Protection Landscape

The Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC) On March 20, 2025 issued the Nigeria Data Protection…

1 month ago

Court May Enforce, Not Set Aside, Foreign Award

CASE TITLE: OIL & INDUSTRIAL SERVICES LTD v. HEMPEL PAINTS (SOUTH AFRICA) PTY LTD (2025)…

1 month ago