Categories: REFLECTIONS

Mediation: A Suggested Resolution, A Forced Compromise, or an Amicable Settlement?

Mediation is the act of negotiation for an amicable settlement. In mediation, the parties agree on a negotiated settlement or go for another dispute resolution. Unlike other dispute resolution, is not necessarily about a win/win nor is it about lose/lose rather it’s about compromising.

The process of mediation is designed to settle and compromise a dispute. A mediator as a facilitator may be under pressure to come to a settlement so there should be stop gaps put in a place to avoid the pressure. A Mediator makes an emotional decision and justifies it with logic. Emotion is important in Mediation but it is essential that it should be managed. The mindset of handling a family mediation is different from the mindset of handling a commercial mediation.

In a compromise, both parties mutually agree to make concessions. The parties give up some of what they want and neither party receives all of what they want. Both parties end up dissatisfied to some extent, and not necessarily totally happy, even if they may be equally as unhappy.

Although compromise may result in an agreement, the compromise itself may not always resolve the problem.

A mediator has no power to impose a settlement. Mediation allows the parties to look beyond the legal issues and determine their underlying interests in the dispute. It is essential that parties that wish to use mediation must be prepared to compromise. Parties need to understand the need to compromise.

Watch the full video below.

THIS IS REFLECTIONS, our weekly roundup of events in the legal and technology sector, covering various topics and interesting learning points for today’s professionals.

If you couldn’t make an event, don’t worry, we probably made it and have all the juicy scoop for your reading pleasure and learning.

Do you have an upcoming event you would like us to know about or attend? OR do you know of one you would like to read about? Send an email to us HERE.

lawpavilion

Share
Published by
lawpavilion

Recent Posts

Attorney General’s Consent: A Legal Requirement for Garnishee Proceedings Against the Government?

Introduction The latest decision by the Tax Appeal Tribunal (TAT) on Value Added Tax (VAT)…

3 days ago

5 Ways CaseManager Can Enhance Your Team Performance and Tasks

What is LawPavilion CaseManager Software?Key Features of CaseManager Software:5 Ways CaseManager Can Help Your TeamConclusion…

4 days ago

Whether an Aggrieved Party Must Exhaust All the Remedies Available to Him in Law Before Resorting to Court

CASE TITLE: FADAIRO & ORS v. NASU & ANOR (2024) LPELR-62868(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 12TH JULY,…

4 days ago

Position of the Law Regarding the Requirement of Consent of the Attorney General Before Garnishee Proceedings Can Lie Against Any Government

CASE TITLE: CBN v. OCHIFE & ORS (2025) LPELR-80220(SC) JUDGMENT DATE: 24TH JANUARY, 2025 PRACTICE…

4 days ago

Application of the Doctrine of Stare Decisis

CASE TITLE:  SUIMING ELECTRICAL LTD v. FRN & ORS (2025) LPELR-80179(SC) JUDGMENT DATE: 29TH JANUARY,…

4 days ago

Whether a Bank is Bound to obey the Mandate of a Customer

CASE TITLE: ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES v. POLARIS BANK LTD & ANOR (2025) LPELR-80188(SC) JUDGMENT DATE: 17TH…

4 days ago