Categories: General

Key Arguments on the Bill for an Act to Establish the Police Pension Board

By Ivo Takor, mni, Esq.

INTRODUCTION

On Tuesday, November 19, 2024, the Senate Committee on Establishment and Public Service conducted a public hearing on a bill sponsored by Senator Binos Dauda Yaroe, representing Adamawa South. 

The proposed legislation seeks to establish the Police Pension Board, which would be responsible for managing the pension scheme for police personnel. 

The bill aims to exempt the police force from the Contributory Pension Scheme (CPS) established under the Pension Reform Act of 2014.

On November 13, 2024, the Centre for Pension Rights Advocacy (CPRA) submitted a memorandum to the Clerk of the Senate Committee on Establishment and Public Service, outlining its position and recommendations on the proposed bill. 

During the public hearing held on November 19, 2024, Ivo Takor, mni, the Director of the Centre, was present to formally present the memorandum and articulate the CPRA’s stance on the matter.

CPRA expresses its gratitude for the opportunity to participate in this public hearing and applauds the Senate Committee on Establishment and Public Service for organizing the session. 

The proposed bill aims to create a Police Pension Board to oversee the pension administration for Nigeria Police Force personnel, marking a potential departure from the Contributory Pension Scheme (CPS) established under the Pension Reform Act of 2014.

The Centre acknowledged the immense sacrifices and risks police officers face daily to protect the peace, security, and well-being of Nigerians. Ensuring their welfare, especially in retirement, is crucial. However, after thoroughly reviewing the Pension Reform Act of 2014 and the provisions of the proposed bill, the CPRA firmly believes that the Contributory Pension Scheme (CPS) remains the most secure and sustainable system for ensuring police officers’ pensions and safeguarding them from old age poverty.

CPRA POSITION AND KEY ARGUMENTS

The position of CPRA, as outlined in her memorandum, is as follows:

Protection Against Budgetary Uncertainty

The Contributory Pension Scheme (CPS), as outlined in Section 4 of the Pension Reform Act 2014, establishes a dedicated pool of funds that guarantees pension payments for life. Unlike the Defined Benefits Scheme (DBS), CPS pensions are not reliant on annual budgetary appropriations, ensuring retirees receive timely and consistent payments.

Flexibility for Enhanced Benefits

Section 4(4) of the Pension Reform Act permits employers to enhance pension benefits by either providing additional benefits at retirement or solely funding contributions, in which case the contributions of the employer shall not be less than 20% of employees’ monthly emoluments.

CPRA views this flexibility as a practical means to improve police pensions without dismantling the CPS framework.

Group Life Insurance Coverage

Under Section 4(5), the CPS mandates employers to maintain a Group Life Insurance Policy worth three times an employee’s annual emoluments. This ensures financial security for the families of deceased officers, offering vital support during challenging times.

Ownership and Security of Retirement Savings Accounts (RSAs)

Section 11 of the Pension Reform Act safeguards an officer’s RSA as a personal account protected from interference. Even in cases of dismissal, the officer retains full access to their contributions, ensuring that earned benefits remain intact.

Oversight and Regulation by PenCom

The National Pension Commission (PenCom), established under Section 17, oversees and regulates pension administration in the country. This guarantees transparency, accountability, and professionalism in managing pension funds, protecting the contributions of police personnel.

Specialized Pension Fund Administration for the Police

In response to calls for tailored solutions, NPF Pensions Ltd. was established in 2014 as a specialized Pension Fund Administrator for the Nigeria Police Force. This entity operates independently of the public service bureaucracy, employing experts to efficiently manage pensions while addressing the specific needs of police officers.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the foregoing analysis, the CPRA submits the following recommendations:

Enhanced Gratuity Payments

The Federal Government should provide police retirees with a gratuity amounting to 300% of their final annual gross pay upon retirement, while their Retirement Savings Accounts (RSAs) continue to fund their monthly pensions.

Government-Exclusive Contributions

The Federal Government should assume full responsibility for funding police pensions under the CPS. This approach would enhance the adequacy and sustainability of police retirement benefits without disrupting the current pension system.

Retention of Full Salaries for Senior Officers

Senior police officers at the rank of Assistant Inspector-General (AIG) and above, who currently retire with their full salaries as pensions, should retain this benefit within the CPS framework to ensure continuity and fairness.

Unified Support for the CPS

The Contributory Pension Scheme should remain the foundation of police pensions, with necessary enhancements implemented within its existing structure as provided under the Pension Reform Act of 2014. This ensures stability, transparency, and long-term financial security for police personnel.

Source: Loyalnigerialawyer

lawpavilion

Recent Posts

Duty of Care of a Transport Company to its Passengers

CASE TITLE: MISS PHILIP JULIET v. PEACE MASS TRANSIT LIMITED (2025)LPELR-80333(CA)JUDGMENT DATE: 22nd Jan, 2025JUSTICES:…

3 days ago

What is the Appropriate Manner to Impeach the Contents of a Record of Appeal?

CASE TITLE: MUHAMMAD v. ALARAMMA & ANOR (2025) LPELR-81190(CA) JUDGMENT DATE:  16TH MAY, 2025 PRACTICE…

3 days ago

Can a Witness be Further Cross-Examined if New Matters are Introduced During His Re-Examination?

CASE TITLE:  JABI v. STATE (2025) LPELR-81176(SC) JUDGMENT DATE: 9TH MAY, 2025 PRACTICE AREA: CRIMINAL LAW…

3 days ago

Whether The Sharia Court of Appeal Has Jurisdiction to Hear and Determine Any Matter Relating to Title to Land

CASE TITLE: MATSERI v. SHARU (2025) LPELR-81178(SC) JUDGMENT DATE: 9TH MAY, 2025 PRACTICE AREA: PRACTICE…

3 days ago

The Court of Appeal Rules, 2021: Procedural Impact on Appeals Emanating from Court Martial to the Court of Appeal

Background: Despite being an apex disciplinary organ of the Armed Forces, the decision of a…

3 days ago

Okonjo-Iweala v. Fawehinmi: Demystifying Locus Standi (2)

By Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, SAN Supreme Court’s Distinction Without a Difference Whereas in one breath, the…

3 days ago