Is the Prosecution Duty-Bound to Prove That an Accused Person Had Mens Rea and Actus Reus?

CASE TITLE: AKINLEYE v. STATE (2024) LPELR-62541 (CA)

JUDGMENT DATE: 12TH JULY, 2024

PRACTICE AREACRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE

LEAD JUDGMENT: JOSEPH OLUBUNMI KAYODE OYEWOLE, J.C.A.

SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT:

INTRODUCTION:

This appeal borders on the offence of murder.

FACTS:

This is an appeal against the judgment of the High Court of Ogun State, Ijebu-Ode Judicial Division sitting at Ijebu-Ode, Ogun State.

The Appellant was arraigned on one count charge of murder of her husband. The prosecution led evidence, which the trial court accepted, that consequent on a dispute between the appellant and the deceased, the appellant, after ensuring that she was alone in the house with the deceased, poured petrol on him where he sat and set him on fire.  After that, she locked the front and back doors of the house and left. Neighbors broke the door and rescued the deceased, who was still alive but had suffered very severe burns. He was rushed to the hospital, where he died hours later while about to be moved to a bigger hospital he had been referred to. The deceased, however, repeatedly narrated to witnesses how the appellant set him on fire and eventually made a statement that was recorded in writing by the police before giving up the ghost. The appellant denied the allegation and gave evidence to that effect at trial.

After taking the final addresses of the respective counsel, the learned trial Judge in a considered judgment rejected the defence of the Appellant and found her guilty of the murder allegation. He then convicted and sentenced her to death by hanging.

In the exercise of her right of appeal, the Appellant appealed.

ISSUE(S) FOR DETERMINATION:

The Court adopted the issues for determination formulated by the Appellant viz:

1. “Whether Court can base its decision on the medical report, purportedly written by someone, whose qualification and experience cannot be verified and whose whereabouts are not known, merely found attached to the case file and tendered by a police officer, who is not a medical doctor or pathologist, on the cause of death of the deceased.

2. Whether the trial Court was right to convict Appellant on the conflicting evidence of PW1, PW2, PW3, PW5 and exhibit B.

3. Whether the Court ought not to consider, in detail and in favour of the Appellant, the possibility of suicide and assassination and the defence of alibi and self defence.

4. Whether Appellant can be convicted of murder without the prosecution establishing the legal ingredients of mens rea and the actus reus of the offence.

5. Whether the Court ought not to consider and try Appellant on a lesser offence of manslaughter or attempted murder, based on the evidence before it.”

DECISION/HELD:

In conclusion, the Court dismissed the appeal.

RATIOS:

  • CONSTITUTIONAL LAW- PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE: Presumption of innocence of an accused person; duty of prosecution to rebut same
  • COURT- DUTY OF COURT: Duty of court to consider all the possible defences open to an accused person
  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE- OFFENCE OF MURDER: Duty of the prosecution in a murder charge
  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE- MENS REA AND ACTUS REUS: Whether the prosecution is duty bound to prove that an accused person had mens rea and actus reus
  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE- INTENTION: How intention is inferred in murder cases
  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE- OFFENCE OF MURDER/MANSLAUGHTER: Instances when a person charged with the offence of murder can be convicted of manslaughter
  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE- ATTEMPT TO COMMIT AN OFFENCE: What constitutes an attempt to commit an offence
  • EVIDENCE- STANDARD OF PROOF: Standard of proof in criminal cases and when the prosecution will be said to have proved its case beyond reasonable doubt
  • EVIDENCE- CAUSE OF DEATH: Circumstances where medical evidence would be dispensed with as to the cause of death
  • EVIDENCE- CONTRADICTION IN EVIDENCE: How contradiction in the extra judicial statement of a witness and his evidence in Court is established
  • EVIDENCE- CONTRADICTION IN EVIDENCE: Duty of the party claiming that there is contradiction between evidence on oath and extra judicial statement of a witness
  • EVIDENCE- DYING DECLARATION: When is a dying declaration admissible?
  • JUDGMENT AND ORDER- JUDGMENT OF COURT: Basis of decision of Court

To read the full judgment or similar judgments, subscribe to Prime or Primsol

lawpavilion

Recent Posts

The Court of Appeal Rules, 2021: Procedural Impact on Appeals Emanating from Courts-Martial to the Court of Appeal

Background: Despite being an apex disciplinary organ of the Armed Forces, the decision of a…

3 days ago

Alleged Misuse of Personal Data in Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan Attempted Recall Sparks Privacy Concerns for Social Assistance Beneficiaries in Africa – Tolulope Idowu

The recent controversy surrounding the attempted recall of Nigerian Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has done more…

3 days ago

Young, Bold & Leading: Charting Early Excellence in the Legal Profession in an AI-Driven World

Oyetola Muyiwa Atoyebi, SAN FCIARB.(U.K)MAY 30, 2025 Contributor: Jesutofunmi Idowu INTRODUCTION There is a quiet revolution unfolding…

3 days ago

Investment of Pension Funds in Nigeria: Legal Framework, Economic Impact, and Reform Prospects

By Muhammad Yasir Abubakar-Sadiq, AICMC INTRODUCTION The establishment of a robust pension system is a…

3 days ago

Whether The Defence of Provocation and Self-Defence are Mutually Exclusive

CASE TITLE: JACKSON v. STATE (2025) LPELR-80692(SC)JUDGMENT DATE: 7TH MARCH, 2025PRACTICE AREA: CRIMINAL LAW AND…

4 days ago

Can the Court Make an Order Against or in Favour of a Person Who is Not a Party to a Suit?

CASE TITLE: FIDELITY BANK PLC v. SAGECOM CONCEPTS LTD. & ANOR (2025) LPELR-81172(SC)JUDGMENT DATE: 11TH…

4 days ago