Is the Prosecution Duty-Bound to Prove That an Accused Person Had Mens Rea and Actus Reus?

CASE TITLE: AKINLEYE v. STATE (2024) LPELR-62541 (CA)

JUDGMENT DATE: 12TH JULY, 2024

PRACTICE AREACRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE

LEAD JUDGMENT: JOSEPH OLUBUNMI KAYODE OYEWOLE, J.C.A.

SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT:

INTRODUCTION:

This appeal borders on the offence of murder.

FACTS:

This is an appeal against the judgment of the High Court of Ogun State, Ijebu-Ode Judicial Division sitting at Ijebu-Ode, Ogun State.

The Appellant was arraigned on one count charge of murder of her husband. The prosecution led evidence, which the trial court accepted, that consequent on a dispute between the appellant and the deceased, the appellant, after ensuring that she was alone in the house with the deceased, poured petrol on him where he sat and set him on fire.  After that, she locked the front and back doors of the house and left. Neighbors broke the door and rescued the deceased, who was still alive but had suffered very severe burns. He was rushed to the hospital, where he died hours later while about to be moved to a bigger hospital he had been referred to. The deceased, however, repeatedly narrated to witnesses how the appellant set him on fire and eventually made a statement that was recorded in writing by the police before giving up the ghost. The appellant denied the allegation and gave evidence to that effect at trial.

After taking the final addresses of the respective counsel, the learned trial Judge in a considered judgment rejected the defence of the Appellant and found her guilty of the murder allegation. He then convicted and sentenced her to death by hanging.

In the exercise of her right of appeal, the Appellant appealed.

ISSUE(S) FOR DETERMINATION:

The Court adopted the issues for determination formulated by the Appellant viz:

1. “Whether Court can base its decision on the medical report, purportedly written by someone, whose qualification and experience cannot be verified and whose whereabouts are not known, merely found attached to the case file and tendered by a police officer, who is not a medical doctor or pathologist, on the cause of death of the deceased.

2. Whether the trial Court was right to convict Appellant on the conflicting evidence of PW1, PW2, PW3, PW5 and exhibit B.

3. Whether the Court ought not to consider, in detail and in favour of the Appellant, the possibility of suicide and assassination and the defence of alibi and self defence.

4. Whether Appellant can be convicted of murder without the prosecution establishing the legal ingredients of mens rea and the actus reus of the offence.

5. Whether the Court ought not to consider and try Appellant on a lesser offence of manslaughter or attempted murder, based on the evidence before it.”

DECISION/HELD:

In conclusion, the Court dismissed the appeal.

RATIOS:

  • CONSTITUTIONAL LAW- PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE: Presumption of innocence of an accused person; duty of prosecution to rebut same
  • COURT- DUTY OF COURT: Duty of court to consider all the possible defences open to an accused person
  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE- OFFENCE OF MURDER: Duty of the prosecution in a murder charge
  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE- MENS REA AND ACTUS REUS: Whether the prosecution is duty bound to prove that an accused person had mens rea and actus reus
  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE- INTENTION: How intention is inferred in murder cases
  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE- OFFENCE OF MURDER/MANSLAUGHTER: Instances when a person charged with the offence of murder can be convicted of manslaughter
  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE- ATTEMPT TO COMMIT AN OFFENCE: What constitutes an attempt to commit an offence
  • EVIDENCE- STANDARD OF PROOF: Standard of proof in criminal cases and when the prosecution will be said to have proved its case beyond reasonable doubt
  • EVIDENCE- CAUSE OF DEATH: Circumstances where medical evidence would be dispensed with as to the cause of death
  • EVIDENCE- CONTRADICTION IN EVIDENCE: How contradiction in the extra judicial statement of a witness and his evidence in Court is established
  • EVIDENCE- CONTRADICTION IN EVIDENCE: Duty of the party claiming that there is contradiction between evidence on oath and extra judicial statement of a witness
  • EVIDENCE- DYING DECLARATION: When is a dying declaration admissible?
  • JUDGMENT AND ORDER- JUDGMENT OF COURT: Basis of decision of Court

To read the full judgment or similar judgments, subscribe to Prime or Primsol

lawpavilion

Recent Posts

Industrial Court validates Staff Employment Termination over NYSC Certificate

Hon. Justice Sinmisola Adeniyi of the Abuja Judicial Division of the National Industrial Court has…

2 days ago

FRN v. AKAEZE: Criminal Investigation Simplified (2)

By Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, SAN The main responsibility of the court is to interpret the law…

3 days ago

The Duty of ‘Law’ as an Instrument of ‘Social Justice’ For ‘Peace’ to Reign

ByAmb. Hameed Ajibola Jimoh, Esq. FIGPCM, CGARB. (CERTIFIED GLOBAL PEACE AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION AND MANAGEMENT…

1 week ago

Is Service of Pre-Action Notice a Contradiction to the Constitutional Right of Access to Court?

CASE TITLE: ORIENTAL ENERGY RESOURCES LTD v. NICON INSURANCE PLC (2024) LPELR-61988(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 25TH…

1 week ago

Copyright Infringement, Defences & Remedies Under Nigerian Law

The body of law for copyright protection in Nigeria is the Copyright Act 2022 and judicial decisions…

1 week ago

The Legality of Indefinite Suspension of an Employee

What is the Meaning of Indefinite Suspension? Suspension is the placement of an employee in…

1 week ago