Categories: Be the FIRST to KNOW

IS POSSESSION OF A STOLEN ITEM PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE THAT THE PERSON IN POSSESSION OF THE ITEM PARTICIPATED IN THE ROBBERY?

CASE TITLE: ONAKPORO v. STATE (2019) LPELR-48795(CA)

JUDGMENT DATE: 1ST NOVEMBER, 2019

PRACTICE AREA: CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE

LEAD JUDGE: MOORE ASEIMO ABRAHAM ADUMEIN, J.C.A.

SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT:

INTRODUCTION

This appeal borders on Criminal Law and Procedure.

FACTS

This is an appeal against the decision of the High Court sitting in Delta State.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offences of conspiracy to commit armed robbery and armed robbery on the 1st of November, 2011 by the High Court in Charge No. EHC/12C/2010. He was sentenced to death by hanging.

Being dissatisfied, the Appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal.

ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION

The Court determined the appeal on these issues couched as follows:

  1. Whether the appellant was properly identified by the prosecution’s witnesses?
  2. Whether the appellant’s defence of alibi was properly considered by the trial Court before sentencing him to death?
  3. Whether the essential ingredients of the offence of conspiracy and armed robbery have been established by the prosecution?
  4. Was the trial Court right when it admitted in evidence the alleged confessional statement as Exhibit B1 without conducting a trial within trial and proceeded to rely on same in reaching a verdict of guilt.

DECISION/HELD

On the whole, the Court found no merit in the appeal and accordingly dismissed same.

RATIOS:

  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE- DEFENCE/PLEA OF ALIBI: Position of the law on the defence of alibi
  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE- OFFENCE OF ROBBERY: Whether possession of the stolen item is prima facie evidence that a person in such possession participated in the robbery
  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE- OFFENCE OF ARMED ROBBERY: Ingredients that must exist to prove the offence of armed robbery
  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE- GUILT OF AN ACCUSED PERSON: How to establish/prove the guilt of an accused person
  • EVIDENCE- BURDEN OF PROOF/ONUS OF PROOF: Burden on a defendant/accused person to prove his defence to a criminal allegation
  • EVIDENCE- IDENTIFICATION EVIDENCE: Instance where formal identification of an accused person will not be necessary
  • EVIDENCE- CONFESSIONAL STATEMENT: The position of the law on a retracted statement
WHAT OUR CLIENTS ARE SAYING…

LawPavilion has made research easy and keeping up to date with latest/recent judgments.

~DARE ADARAMOLA

lawpavilion

Recent Posts

Third Party Investigations and Six-Year Limit for Tax Assessments

INTRODUCTION The tax investigation involving Lafarge Africa Plc (Lafarge) and the Ogun State Internal Revenue…

1 month ago

Is Workplace Promotion a Privilege or a Right?

CASE TITLE: PHILIP v. ADSU, MUBI & ORS (2025) LPELR-81492(CA)JUDGMENT DATE: 26TH JUNE, 2025JUSTICES: FREDERICK…

1 month ago

Whether a Class of Persons Can Be Defamed; Duty on a Person Within That Class Who Intends to Maintain an Action for Defamation

CASE TITLE: ACCESS BANK PLC v. EDIALE (2025) LPELR-81868(CA) JUDGMENT DATE:  22ND JULY, 2025 PRACTICE…

1 month ago

Whether an Area Court Has Jurisdiction to Distribute the Estate of A Deceased Muslim who Contracted both a Statutory Marriage and an Islamic Marriage

CASE TITLE: ADEKUNLE & ORS v. AHMAD (2025) LPELR-81978(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 3RD SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRACTICE…

1 month ago

NDP Act 2023 GAID 2025: A Comprehensive Guide to Nigeria’s New Data Protection Landscape

The Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC) On March 20, 2025 issued the Nigeria Data Protection…

1 month ago

Court May Enforce, Not Set Aside, Foreign Award

CASE TITLE: OIL & INDUSTRIAL SERVICES LTD v. HEMPEL PAINTS (SOUTH AFRICA) PTY LTD (2025)…

1 month ago