CASE TITLE: ANIMASHAUN v. STATE (2024) LPELR-62550 (CA)
JUDGMENT DATE: 12 JULY 2024
PRACTICE AREA: CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE
LEAD JUDGMENT: MUSLIM SULE HASSAN, J.C.A.
SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT:
INTRODUCTION:
This appeal borders on the offences of conspiracy and armed robbery.
FACTS:
This is an appeal against the decision of High Court sitting in Sagamu, Ogun State, delivered by Hon. Justice E. O. Osinuga on the 10th day of July, 2017.
The Prosecution’s case at the trial Court which was presented basically by Afolabi Orekoya, PW1, who was the victim of armed robbery of a Toyota Camry at Ishara, was that he was dragged out of his car by the Appellant at gunpoint, and the gang of armed robbers collected his car and moved away. But because he knew the car had security and it would stop, he alerted the police who came and followed the direction the armed robbers followed.
PW1 stated that the police found his car abandoned on the road, close to Ago-Iwoye junction, and the next day, the police called him to identify his phone, which he did, and the accused was brought, amongst others, for an identification parade, and he identified the Appellant as the person who pulled him out of his car at gunpoint and drove his car away with the gang of thieves.
The case of the Appellant on the other hand, is that he is a motorcycle repairer, and he was given a job by one Ibrahim to repair his motorcycle, and he told Ibrahim that the repair would take two days. After two days, the motorcycle was not ready, but he told Ibrahim to come the next day. Then, when he travelled to get some spare parts in Lagos, Ibrahim called him to know where he was, but only for Ibrahim to appear with policemen, and he was arrested, brought to Sagamu, and kept in prison.
The Appellant was arraigned alone as Defendant before the trial Court on a four-count charge.
Upon the full prosecution of the case against the Appellant, he was convicted on three out of the four counts for which he was sentenced to death.
The Appellant, being aggrieved by the decision of the trial court, lodged this appeal against it with the Court of Appeal.
ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION:
In the determination of this appeal, the Court adopted the following issues:
1. Whether the conviction of the Appellant for the offences of Conspiracy and armed robbery is supported by the weight of evidence presented at the trial by the respondent.
2. Whether having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, the trial Court did not err in law when it admitted and relied on the alleged purported confessional statements credited to the Appellant without subjecting same to the validity tests laid down by law in convicting the Appellant for the offences of conspiracy and armed robbery.
3. Whether considering the evidence adduced at the trial by the Respondent’s witnesses, the purported identification parade done by PW3 was not a mere charade
DECISION/HELD:
In conclusion, the appeal was dismissed.
RATIOS:
To read the full judgment or similar judgments, subscribe to Prime or Primsol
Introduction Acronyms and the legal profession are inseparable. Among the many facets of legal language,…
Introduction The legal industry is undergoing a significant transformation, driven by technological advancements. This shift…
CASE TITLE: OGIEFO v. HRH JAFARU & ORS (2024) LPELR-62942(SC)JUDGMENT DATE: 19TH JULY, 2024PRACTICE AREA:…
CASE TITLE: FBN PLC & ANOR v. BEN-SEGBA TECHNICAL SERVICES LTD & ANOR (2024) LPELR-62998(SC)JUDGMENT…
CASE TITLE: EFCC v. GOVT OF ZAMFARA STATE & ORS (2024) LPELR-62933(CA)JUDGMENT DATE: 20TH SEPTEMBER,…
Introduction We all agree that 'Knowledge" is an asset, right? Otherwise, imagine the volumes of…