Categories: General

FOR A CONFESSIONAL STATEMENT TO ATTRACT AND SUPPORT A CONVICTION, IT MUST BE PROVED TO BE FREE, VOLUNTARY AND UNAMBIGUOUS

CASE TITLE: IDOKO V. STATE (2018) LPELR-45893(CA)

PRACTICE AREA: CRIMINAL APPEAL

LEAD JUDGMENT BY: ONYEKACHI AJA OTISI, J.C.A.

FACTS OF THE CASE SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT

FACTS OF THE CASE

This appeal was lodged against the decision of the High Court of Benue State, sitting at Otukpo, and delivered by Justice S.J. Ogwiji J.

The case of the prosecution was that, on or about the 7th day of November, 2002 at Aiodu-Owukpa in Ogbadigbo Local Government Area of Benue State, appellant and other accused person committed armed robbery when they attacked and robbed one Mr Uji Amedu and his passengers of the sum of N191,530.00, two mobile handsets and car Toyota Carina Reg No DE 970 AAA, at gunpoint. Appellant pleaded not guilty to the charge.

At the conclusion of hearing, the trial Court convicted the Appellant and sentenced him to death. Aggrieved by his conviction and sentence, Appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal.

ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION

The following issues, as formulated by the appellant and respondent respectively, were considered together, in the determination of the appeal:

“i. Whether the identity of the appellant as one of the perpetrators of the crime charged was proved beyond reasonable doubt.

ii. Whether the locus criminis in the charge has been proven.

iii. Whether the lower Court erred in law when it relied solely on the alleged confessional statement of the 1st & 3rd accused persons (Exhibit A & A3 respectively) to convict the appellant for the offence or armed robbery

iv. Whether the lower Court erred in law when it did not consider the defense of alibi put forward by the appellant hence occasioning a grave miscarriage of justice.”

“1. Whether the prosecution proved her case against the appellant.

  1. Whether the lower Court misdirected herself in the evaluation of the evidence before her.”

DECISION/HELD

In conclusion, the appeal was dismissed.

RATIO DECIDENDI

  • EVIDENCE – STANDARD OF PROOF – Required standard of proof in criminal trials and the nature of proof beyond reasonable doubt
  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE – GUILT OF AN ACCUSED PERSON – How to establish/prove the guilt of an accused person
  • EVIDENCE – CONFESSIONAL STATEMENT – Meaning and nature of confession, conditions to be met before convicting on same and the tests for determining the veracity or otherwise of a confessional statement

 

lawpavilion

Recent Posts

A Review of Significant Decisions in Labour and Employment Matters – 2025

Folabi Kuti SAN Armed with the post-2011 constitutional mandate and an express directive to apply…

2 days ago

Medical Misconduct: You Don’t Have to Be Named to Be Investigated

CASE TITLE: RALU V. MEDICAL & DENTAL PRACTITIONERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL LPELR-81420(CAJUDGMENT DATE: 9TH MAY, 2025JUSTICES:…

2 days ago

Whether Naming a Non-Juristic Person as a Party is a Misnomer; Can Amendment of Same Be Allowed?

CASE TITLE: ORHUE v. OSAGHAE (2025) LPELR-82606(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 3RD DECEMBER, 2025 PRACTICE AREA: PRACTICE…

2 days ago

How is Jurisdiction of Court Determined in Criminal Cases?

CASE TITLE:  OLALEKAN v. FRN (2025) LPELR-82652(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 15TH DECEMBER, 2025 PRACTICE AREA: CRIMINAL LAW…

2 days ago

Whether Differences Between a Person’s Signatures on Two Documents Mean That the Signatures Were Not Made by the Same Person

CASE TITLE: AMOBI v. NZEOWU & ORS (2025) LPELR-82651(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 15TH DECEMBER, 2025 PRACTICE…

2 days ago

Revisiting the Supreme Court Case of Sifax v. Migfo: Judicial Legislation in Plain Sight

By:  Kola’ Awodein SAN, FCTI, FICIArb & Misbau Alamu Lateef, Ph.D., SFHEA I. Introduction 1. The…

3 weeks ago