Categories: General

EFFECT OF THE THIRD ALTERATION TO THE CONSTITUTION ON THE JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL AND STATE HIGH COURTS TO HEAR LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL MATTERS PENDING BEFORE THEM

CASE TITLE: THE INCORPORATED TRUSTEES OF THE NIGERIAN BAPTIST CONVENTION V. OJO (2018) LPELR-45933(CA)

PRACTICE AREA: JURISDICTION

LEAD JUDGMENT BY: JIMI OLUKAYODE BADA, J.C.A.

FACTS OF THE CASE

This appeal emanated from the Ruling of the Oyo State High Court of Justice, Ibadan Judicial Division delivered on the 19th day of April 2013 in Suit No: HSK/11/2007- BETWEEN- THE INCORPORATED TRUSTEES OF THE NIGERIAN BAPTIST CONVENTION VS. MR. PHILLIP ADEKUNLE OJO.

Briefly the facts of the case are that the Appellants who were Claimants before the High Court instituted an action against the defendant now Respondent in which it claimed as per paragraph 23 of the Statement of Claims as follows:-

(1) The sum of One Million Two Hundred and Sixteen Thousand Ninety-Nine Naira (N1,216,099.00) only being Special Damages for breach of bond to serve the Claimants up till 30th April 2012.

(2) The sum of Three Million Naira (N3,000,000.00) only for breach of contract of service.

By consent of both parties at the High Court, the suit became part-heard when on 22/4/2010, parties agreed on issues to be determined and documents were admitted as Exhibits without objection. On 14/1/2013 the Respondent by a motion filed in Court  challenged the jurisdiction of the lower Court to entertain the suit as a result of the Third Alteration to the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 which took effect from the 4th day of March 2011 vesting jurisdiction in disputes on labour matters among others in the National Industrial Court of Nigeria. 

At the conclusion of hearing in the said application, the learned trial Judge in a Ruling delivered on 19/4/2013 declined jurisdiction to entertain the suit and struck it out. Dissatisfied, the Appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal.

ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION

The Court determined the appeal on this sole issue couched as follows:

“Whether the lower Court had jurisdiction to conclude the suit before it regardless of the Third Alteration to the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria which made labour matters a subject matter of the exclusive jurisdiction of the National Industrial Court of Nigeria with effect from 4th March 2011 and without retrospective effect.”

DECISION/HELD:

On the whole, the Court found no merit in the appeal and accordingly dismissed same.

RATIO DECIDENDI

JURISDICTION – JURISDICTION OF THE STATE/FEDERAL HIGH COURT – Effect of the third alteration to the Constitution on the jurisdiction of the Federal and State High Courts to hear labour and industrial matters pending before them

 

 

 

lawpavilion

Recent Posts

NOTICE OF DISCLAIMER FOR WRONGFUL AND MISLEADING PUBLICATION

LawPavilion's attention has been drawn to a publication titled "Supreme Court Gives Landmark decisions on…

5 days ago

20 Popular Acronyms Your Legal Team Must Know

Introduction  Acronyms and the legal profession are inseparable. Among the many facets of legal language,…

6 days ago

Legal Tech: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners

Introduction The legal industry is undergoing a significant transformation, driven by technological advancements. This shift…

6 days ago

Status of a Registered Chieftaincy Declaration

CASE TITLE: OGIEFO v. HRH JAFARU & ORS (2024) LPELR-62942(SC)JUDGMENT DATE: 19TH JULY, 2024PRACTICE AREA:…

6 days ago

Whether The Federal High Court and The State High Courts Have Concurrent Jurisdictions in Respect of Banker/Customer Relationships

CASE TITLE: FBN PLC & ANOR v. BEN-SEGBA TECHNICAL SERVICES LTD & ANOR (2024) LPELR-62998(SC)JUDGMENT…

6 days ago

Whether the EFCC can Investigate State House of Assembly Fund Disbursement and Administration

CASE TITLE: EFCC v. GOVT OF ZAMFARA STATE & ORS (2024) LPELR-62933(CA)JUDGMENT DATE: 20TH SEPTEMBER,…

6 days ago