Categories: Be the FIRST to KNOW

Effect of Failure of Court to Consider all Issues Raised Before it

CASE TITLE: MONGUNO v. BLUEWHALES & CO. & ORS (2023) LPELR-59997(SC)

JUDGMENT DATE: 3RD MARCH, 2023

PRACTICE AREA: CIVIL PROCEDURE

LEAD JUDGMENT: IBRAHIM MOHAMMED MUSA SAULAWA, J.S.C.

SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT:

INTRODUCTION:

This appeal borders on the duty of Court to pronounce on all issues raised before it.

FACTS:

The instant appeal is a natural fall-out of the judgment of the Court of Appeal, Abuja Judicial Division, delivered on May 13th, 2010 in appeal No. CA/A/227/2009. By the judgment in question, the Court dismissed the Appellant’s appeal against the judgment of the trial High Court, delivered on June, 24, 2009 in suit No. CV/1293/07.

The Appellant made a case at the Supreme Court that the Court of Appeal did not pronounce on certain salient issues before it in the determination of the appeal and that this failure meant that the Court of Appeal had deprived the Appellant of the right to fair hearing. The main point raised by the Appellant was that the Court of Appeal refused to hear her own side of the story and breached one of the twin pillars of fair hearing which is audi alteram partem- hear the other side, before arriving at its decision.

ISSUES:

The Court considered the merit of the Appellant’s grouse.

DECISION/HELD:

The appeal was allowed and the judgment of the Court of Appeal was set aside. The appeal was sent back to the President of the Court of Appeal to be assigned to a different panel for expeditious hearing on the merit.

RATIOS:

  • COURT – DUTY OF COURT: Duty of Court to consider all issues raised before it; exceptions thereto
  • COURT – DUTY OF COURT: Duty of all Courts lower in hierarchy to the Supreme Court to consider and pronounce on all issues raised before it; effect of failure
  • JUDGMENT AND ORDER – ORDER OF RETRIAL/TRIAL DE NOVO: Distinction between an order of retrial and trial de novo

Click here to log in to your Dashboard to see more judgments. To subscribe, go to store.lawpavilion.com

lawpavilion

Recent Posts

Need for Wholesome Consideration of Facts in Court’s Exercise of Discretion

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at AbujaOn Friday, the 10th day of January,…

1 day ago

What the Court of Appeal Ruled: Marriage Alone Does Not Guarantee Equal Share of Property—Spouse Must Prove Contribution

In a decision underscoring the principles governing property settlement in matrimonial causes, the Court of…

1 day ago

Bail Application: Custody is Not a Prerequisite to Apply for Bail Application

By AbdulRazaq Oshogbade  A crucial issue arose yesterday at the Federal High Court Headquarters, Abuja.…

1 day ago

Of Airlines and Their Passengers

By Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, SAN Senator Oshiomole and Peace The brickbat between one of Nigeria’s foremost…

1 day ago

Climbing the Legal Olympus: What it Takes to Become a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN)

By UJAH ISRAEL UJAH ESQ., B/Phil, LLB, LLM, (Ph.D. in v) I put it to…

1 day ago

The Rise of Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AAI) and the Legal Challenges for Our Global Tax System

By ATER, Solomon Vendaga Introduction AAI systems distinguish themselves through several key characteristics that underscore…

1 day ago