Categories: Be the FIRST to KNOW

DUTY OF AN ACCUSED PERSON RAISING THE DEFENCE OF ALIBI

CASE TITLE: UGWU v. STATE (2020) LPELR-49375(SC)

JUDGMENT DATE: 24TH JANUARY, 2020

PRACTICE AREA: CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE

LEAD JUDGE: OLUKAYODE ARIWOOLA, J.S.C.

SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT:

INTRODUCTION

This appeal borders on Criminal Law and Procedure.

FACTS

This is an appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal, Enugu division delivered on Friday 20th December 2013. The appellant and one other had earlier been arraigned before the Enugu State High Court, sitting at the Nsukka Judicial division, on 21/07/2003.

About 9 pm of the 26th day of May 2002, some men with guns invaded the official residence of Mr Christopher Ogbonna – the Chief Security Officer of the University of Nigeria, Nsukka at Nsukka Elias Avenue, University of Nigeria, Nsukka campus. The said men held Mrs Ogbonna – wife of the deceased, and her children hostage. They seized some of their properties including money. They raped two daughters of the deceased and killed Mr Ogbonna and later escaped from the house.

In the course of the investigation, the police arrested, among others, the appellant and Clement Ezeazu – the 1st accused in the original information. Upon the execution of search warrant in the house of the suspects, several incriminating items were found in the house of Clement Ezeazu, including some of the bottles of the drinks suspected to have been removed from the house of the deceased.

They were charged with conspiracy to murder, and murder of Christopher Ogbonna, the Chief Security Officer of University of Nigeria, Nsukka. Upon their arraignment and the charge read to them, their plea was taken. However, upon an application for bail pending trial brought before a vacation judge of the High Court, in Enugu, Clement Ezeazu, the first accused was granted bail. He later jumped bail and has remained at large. Efforts to re-arrest and bring him to court to stand trial proved abortive. Subsequently, the State with leave of the Court amended the information to drop the name of the first accused – Clement Ezeazu, leaving the appellant alone to stand the trial.

The trial court found the appellant guilty as charged. He was convicted and sentenced to death by hanging.

Aggrieved by the judgment of the Trial Court, the appellant filed an appeal at the Court of appeal. The appeal was found lacking in merit and was accordingly dismissed hence this further appeal to the Supreme Court.

The respondent raised a preliminary objection to Ground one of the appellant’s Notice of Appeal and the issue distilled therefrom on the ground that both are incompetent not being based on or derived from the decision of the Court of Appeal appealed against.

The Court upheld the Preliminary objection but still considered the appeal on the merit.

ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION

The Court determined the merit of the appeal on a lone issue viz:

Whether in the circumstance of this case, an identification parade was necessary. And whether the defence of alibi was sustainable for the appellant.

DECISION/HELD

The appeal was unanimously dismissed. The conviction and sentence of the appellant by the trial Court on 31st March 2008 which was affirmed by the Court of Appeal on 20th December 2018 was further affirmed.

RATIOS:

  • APPEAL- GROUND(S) OF APPEAL: Effect of a ground of appeal and the issue formulated therefrom not flowing from the decision appealed against
  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE- DEFENCE/PLEA OF ALIBI: Meaning and nature of the defence of alibi
  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE- DEFENCE/PLEA OF ALIBI: Duty of the prosecution to investigate the plea of alibi raised by an accused person
  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE- DEFENCE/PLEA OF ALIBI: Circumstances where the defence of alibi would not avail an accused person
  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE- IDENTIFICATION PARADE: Position of the law as regards identification parade
  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE- BAIL: Duty of a judge when considering an application for bail
  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE- IDENTIFICATION PARADE: Circumstances where an identification parade will not be necessary
  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE- IDENTIFICATION PARADE: Purpose of identification parade; Instance(s) in which it will not be necessary
  • CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE- IDENTIFICATION PARADE: Whether an identification parade is essential to a conviction.
WHAT OUR CLIENTS ARE SAYING…

I activated the LawPavilion on Whatsapp. I must say, i’m enjoying it. Great work!

~OMOSALEWA

lawpavilion

Recent Posts

5 Must-Have Skills for Lawyers to Succeed in 2025

Introduction The legal profession has always been known for its high standards and unique demands,…

14 hours ago

Can the Court Impose a Willing Employee on an Unwilling Employer?

CASE TITLE: UNITY BANK PLC v. ALONGE (2024) LPELR-61898(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 4TH APRIL, 2024 JUSTICES:…

3 days ago

Whether it is Necessary to Have Corroboration in A Rape Trial

CASE TITLE: ODIONYE v. FRN (2024) LPELR-62923(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 5TH SEPTEMBER, 2024 PRACTICE AREA: CRIMINAL LAW…

3 days ago

Whether The Law on Limitation of Action Applies to Cases of Continuous Damage/Injury

CASE TITLE: EFFIONG v. MOBIL PRODUCING (NIG.) UNLTD (2024) LPELR-62930(CA)JUDGMENT DATE: 27TH SEPTEMBER, 2024PRACTICE AREA:…

3 days ago

Nature and Ingredients of The Offence of Criminal Trespass

CASE TITLE: ONWUSOR v. STATE (2024) LPELR-63031(CA) JUDGMENT DATE: 12TH NOVEMBER, 2024 PRACTICE AREA: CRIMINAL…

3 days ago

Illegality of Charging Protesters with Terrorism and Treason

By Femi Falana SAN Introduction Last week, President Bola Tinubu ordered the immediate termination of…

3 days ago