If you find this case helpful and would like to access more cases like this, please subscribe to LawPavilion PRIME here
CASE TITLE: NCC v. MOTOPHONE LTD & ANOR (2019) LPELR-47401(SC)
JUDGMENT DATE: 12TH APRIL, 2019
PRACTICE AREA: CIVIL PROCEDURE
LEAD JUDGMENT: UWANI MUSA ABBA AJI, J.S.C.
SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT:
INTRODUCTION
This appeal borders on Civil Procedure.
FACTS
This is an appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal.
The facts are that the 1st Respondent was awarded 2 Communications licenses as Private Network License and the Mobil Cellular License premised on continuing conditions to be met by the 1st Respondent, otherwise the License would be invalidated without the necessity of formal withdrawal or revocation. However, the 1st Respondent failed to meet some of the conditions especially the requirement to start operation within 6 months of the award of the Licenses and also interconnection with NITEL. The 1st Respondent also did not meet the condition of Frequency Allocation by the Federal Ministry of Communications (the 2nd Respondent). Thus, the 1st Respondent lost the frequency by which it could offer services as a communications company and therefore would not be able to offer services. It was because of this loss and withdrawal of the frequencies that the Appellant offered to refund the License fees to the 1st Respondent. In its considered judgment delivered on 8/7/2005 at pages 36-63, the Federal High Court granted to the 1st Respondent damages in the sum of N93,651,950 and the US $10 million.
Dissatisfied, the Appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal which also in its judgment of 10/7/2010 affirmed the judgment of the Federal High Court, hence an appeal to the Supreme Court.
The Respondents also filed a Cross-appeal.
ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION
The Court determined the appeal on these issues couched as follows:
MAIN APPEAL
CROSS-APPEAL
Whether upon the finding of NCC breach of contract, the learned Judge did correctly or at all assess damages suffered by MOTOPHONE or whether the issue ought to be re-assessed?
DECISION/HELD
On the whole, the Court found no merit in the main appeal and the cross-appeal and both were accordingly dismissed.
RATIOS:
LawPavilion's attention has been drawn to a publication titled "Supreme Court Gives Landmark decisions on…
Introduction Acronyms and the legal profession are inseparable. Among the many facets of legal language,…
Introduction The legal industry is undergoing a significant transformation, driven by technological advancements. This shift…
CASE TITLE: OGIEFO v. HRH JAFARU & ORS (2024) LPELR-62942(SC)JUDGMENT DATE: 19TH JULY, 2024PRACTICE AREA:…
CASE TITLE: FBN PLC & ANOR v. BEN-SEGBA TECHNICAL SERVICES LTD & ANOR (2024) LPELR-62998(SC)JUDGMENT…
CASE TITLE: EFCC v. GOVT OF ZAMFARA STATE & ORS (2024) LPELR-62933(CA)JUDGMENT DATE: 20TH SEPTEMBER,…