Categories: Be the FIRST to KNOW

Application of the Public Officers’ Protection Act/Law

CASE TITLE: SHU’AIBU V. C.O.P KANO & ANOR (2022) LPELR-57293(CA)

JUDGMENT DATE: 4TH APRIL, 2022

PRACTICE AREA: LEGISLATION.

LEAD JUDGMENT: ITA GEORGE MBABA, J.C.A.

SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT:

INTRODUCTION:

This appeal borders on limitation of action against public officers.

FACTS:

This appeal is against the decision of the Kano State High Court delivered on 30th July, 2018.

The Appellant’s case was that he was arrested in Jos on 23/12/2009, by the agents of 1st Respondent who were looking for his elder brother. That he was brought to Kano and detained by the 1st Respondent until he was later charged to the Kano State High Court by the 2nd Respondent on 21st November 2011, for receiving stolen property. The Kano State High Court however discharged and acquitted him on 21/12/2017.

​Upon his discharge, Appellant took out a writ of summons to protest his travail in the hands of the Respondents.

Upon service of the process on the Respondents, the 2nd Respondent filed a Preliminary Objection challenging the competence of the suit on the grounds that it disclosed no cause of action against the 2nd Respondents and that it was statute-barred.

After hearing the preliminary objection and considering the evidence and addresses of Counsel, the trial judge upheld the preliminary objection, held that the suit was statute-barred and dismissed it.

Dissatisfied, the Appellant appealed.

ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION:

 The appeal was determined upon consideration of the issue thus:

“Was the trial Court right to hold that Appellant’s Suit was caught by the limitation law, and dismissed it?”

DECISION/HELD:

In the final analysis, the appeal succeeded and was allowed. The decision of the trial Court was set aside and the suit was sent back to the Chief Judge of Kano State for reassignment to another Judge other than the trial Judge.

RATIOS:

  • ACTION – STATUTE BARRED ACTION: How to determine whether an action is statute-barred
  • PUBLIC OFFICER – PUBLIC OFFICERS PROTECTION ACT/LAW: Statutory Provisions as regards limitation period for bringing an action against a Public Officer
  • PUBLIC OFFICER – PUBLIC OFFICERS PROTECTION ACT/LAW: Instances when the Public Officers Protection Act will not apply

lawpavilion

Recent Posts

Is Medical Evidence Enough to Prove Rape? An Analysis of the Legal Standard.

By Sani Abdullahi The use of medical evidence in rape cases has been a contentious…

1 day ago

FRSC cannot Criminalise the use of Faded Numbers Plates, Federal High Court Rules

The Federal High Court in Lagos has ruled that the Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC)…

1 day ago

The Nigeria Police Force (NPF) and Its Power to Effect Arrests Across State Boundaries.

By Saheed Hossein, Esq. The Nigeria Police Force (NPF) in any state of the federation…

2 days ago

Whether Compulsory Acquisition of Land Extinguishes the Existing Title to the Acquired Land

CASE TITLE: KOFARE & ANOR v. TAHIR & ANOR (2024) LPELR-63072(CA)JUDGMENT DATE: 28TH NOVEMBER, 2024PRACTICE…

2 days ago

Effect of an Incomplete Record on The Jurisdiction of The Court of Appeal

CASE TITLE: REGISTERED TRUSTEE OF MEDIA INITIATIVE AGAINST INJUSTICE VIOLENCE AND CORRUPTION (MIVOOC) v. A.G…

2 days ago

Ingredients Required to Establish the Offence of Culpable Homicide Punishable With Death and the Methods of Proving It

CASE TITLE: C.O.P. v. SIMON (2024) LPELR-63065(CA)JUDGMENT DATE: 2ND DECEMBER, 2024PRACTICE AREA: CRIMINAL LAW AND…

2 days ago