Categories: Be the FIRST to KNOW

Application of the Public Officers’ Protection Act/Law

CASE TITLE: SHU’AIBU V. C.O.P KANO & ANOR (2022) LPELR-57293(CA)

JUDGMENT DATE: 4TH APRIL, 2022

PRACTICE AREA: LEGISLATION.

LEAD JUDGMENT: ITA GEORGE MBABA, J.C.A.

SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT:

INTRODUCTION:

This appeal borders on limitation of action against public officers.

FACTS:

This appeal is against the decision of the Kano State High Court delivered on 30th July, 2018.

The Appellant’s case was that he was arrested in Jos on 23/12/2009, by the agents of 1st Respondent who were looking for his elder brother. That he was brought to Kano and detained by the 1st Respondent until he was later charged to the Kano State High Court by the 2nd Respondent on 21st November 2011, for receiving stolen property. The Kano State High Court however discharged and acquitted him on 21/12/2017.

​Upon his discharge, Appellant took out a writ of summons to protest his travail in the hands of the Respondents.

Upon service of the process on the Respondents, the 2nd Respondent filed a Preliminary Objection challenging the competence of the suit on the grounds that it disclosed no cause of action against the 2nd Respondents and that it was statute-barred.

After hearing the preliminary objection and considering the evidence and addresses of Counsel, the trial judge upheld the preliminary objection, held that the suit was statute-barred and dismissed it.

Dissatisfied, the Appellant appealed.

ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION:

 The appeal was determined upon consideration of the issue thus:

“Was the trial Court right to hold that Appellant’s Suit was caught by the limitation law, and dismissed it?”

DECISION/HELD:

In the final analysis, the appeal succeeded and was allowed. The decision of the trial Court was set aside and the suit was sent back to the Chief Judge of Kano State for reassignment to another Judge other than the trial Judge.

RATIOS:

  • ACTION – STATUTE BARRED ACTION: How to determine whether an action is statute-barred
  • PUBLIC OFFICER – PUBLIC OFFICERS PROTECTION ACT/LAW: Statutory Provisions as regards limitation period for bringing an action against a Public Officer
  • PUBLIC OFFICER – PUBLIC OFFICERS PROTECTION ACT/LAW: Instances when the Public Officers Protection Act will not apply

lawpavilion

Recent Posts

Duty of Care of a Transport Company to its Passengers

CASE TITLE: MISS PHILIP JULIET v. PEACE MASS TRANSIT LIMITED (2025)LPELR-80333(CA)JUDGMENT DATE: 22nd Jan, 2025JUSTICES:…

5 days ago

What is the Appropriate Manner to Impeach the Contents of a Record of Appeal?

CASE TITLE: MUHAMMAD v. ALARAMMA & ANOR (2025) LPELR-81190(CA) JUDGMENT DATE:  16TH MAY, 2025 PRACTICE…

5 days ago

Can a Witness be Further Cross-Examined if New Matters are Introduced During His Re-Examination?

CASE TITLE:  JABI v. STATE (2025) LPELR-81176(SC) JUDGMENT DATE: 9TH MAY, 2025 PRACTICE AREA: CRIMINAL LAW…

5 days ago

Whether The Sharia Court of Appeal Has Jurisdiction to Hear and Determine Any Matter Relating to Title to Land

CASE TITLE: MATSERI v. SHARU (2025) LPELR-81178(SC) JUDGMENT DATE: 9TH MAY, 2025 PRACTICE AREA: PRACTICE…

5 days ago

The Court of Appeal Rules, 2021: Procedural Impact on Appeals Emanating from Court Martial to the Court of Appeal

Background: Despite being an apex disciplinary organ of the Armed Forces, the decision of a…

5 days ago

Okonjo-Iweala v. Fawehinmi: Demystifying Locus Standi (2)

By Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, SAN Supreme Court’s Distinction Without a Difference Whereas in one breath, the…

5 days ago